James McKee, of Dublin township, Huntingdon county, bequeathed to his wife Mary, the

use and benefit of his whole land, until his youngest son Henry came of the age of twenty-one,

"if she continues my widow, and also for the support of her and the children, and if she does 

not continue my widow, until the said Henry McKee comes to age, but marries another,

I do ratify and allow her for her legacy, one horse and saddle, and one case of drawers,

together with bed and bedding." "And I further give and devise to my said eldest son,

James McKee, and my youngest son Henry McKee, . . .all my leasehold estate . . .

situated in Dublin township, Huntingdon county, equally to be divided between them." . . . 

and the residue of his personal estate was to be appraised and sold, within six months . . .

"for the good of my wife and family." He appointed his wife one of the executors of his will.

 

It was proved that the widow was married to McAninch, in 1815 [5], and continued so for

more than 20 years. James McKee, Jr., died after his mother married McAninch. He died

in his minority -- intestate and without issue. She remained on the land until it came into the

hands of Laughlin, eight or nine years ago [circa 1840-1841-1842]. Laughlin purchased the

land . . . at sheriff's sale, when sold as the property of Henry McKee, the surviving son.[6]

 

On the part of the plaintiffs was offered articles of agreement, as follows:

 

Witnesseth, that whereas, there never was a writ of partition or valuation had or held on the

real estate of the said James McKee, deceased: And whereas, the aforesaid William Laughlin,

has, by a sheriff's deed, became the owner of the said real estate, subject to the said Mary

McKee's claim to the said real estate, by right of her deceased husband, as above named [7]:

Now know all men by these presents, that we, Alexander McAninch, as above stated, and

Wm. Laughlin, as above mentioned, have amicably agreed and appointed and chosen Samuel

Finley, James Hudson and Robert Campbell, to go on the said premises, and to fix a valuation

on the said real estate . . . said valuation . . . to be final and conclusive, to the decease of the

said Mary McKee, now Mary McAninch, the said Wm. Laughlin . . . to pay to the said

Alexander McAninch, or Mary his wife, the yearly interest of the one-third part of the said

valuation, during her natural life, and no longer. . . . as witness our hands and seals, this

twenty-eighth day of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and forty-two.

 

Mary McAninch, [l. s.] Alex. McAninch, [l. s.] Wm. P. Laughlin, [l. s.]

 

Report of said referees written on the back of the article of agreement, read as follows:

"We . . . did meet . . . on the said premises, on the twenty-ninth day of April, 1842, . . . did

proceed to view the premises within mentioned, and did value and appraise the said plantation

at the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, or the yearly rent, or interest of ninety dollars a year . . .

 

Plaintiff [McAninch] also proved . . . that Wm. P. Laughlin continued in possession of the

premises under this agreement, and that the first year's rent of $30 was paid by him [Laughlin]

to plaintiff [McAninch], and that defendant [Laughlin] expressed himself satisfied with the

 

___________________________________________________________________________

McAninch Family History NL v.XV n.1 /  January 2007 / Copyright Frank McAninch / page 2007-04

 

Table of Contents for this Year

First Page of this Issue

Previous Page

Next Page